Trial Wooden CNC Table


This first wooden table was based on the flying gantry system. It was an experiment with CNC, so it was built as inexpensively as possible with shop scraps.

The machine was made primarily of sheathing plywood.
The rails were black iron gas pipe, and the bearings were 608 skate bearings.
The leadscrews were threaded rods, and the leadnuts were rod couplers.

The machine used 420 oz.in. servos that were driven by Gecko 320s. These were recycled into a larger metal machine.

This type of machine has many limitations, which are listed at the bottom of this page.
Trial CNC Machine
Flying gantry machine.

Back of wooden gantry
Plywood gantry.


Pipes attached to gantry ends Pipe Supports
The rails were supported by rings that were cut with a hole saw.
Tee nuts with bolts in the rings permitted rail alignment.

This system did not incorporate rail supports; therefore, the longer axes flexed under heavier cutting loads.

There are pictures of the different bearing systems on the bearings page.


Bearings bolted to angles were used for the Z axis.

The bearings were attached to the Z plate, and the rails were fixed to the carriage.

This system was difficult to align and tension.

It became clear that for the shorter Z axis, it is better for the rails to move, and for the bearings to be fixed.

Stiff rails would add rigidity to the moving components, and the bearings could be tightly tensioned.
Bearing on Z axis
Bearings on Z plate.



A leadnut was a rod coupler, which was cut almost all of the way through. Tines were welded onto each side of the cut.
A bolt was threaded into one of the tines; it free-wheeled in the other.
Tightening the bolt bent the rod coupler, and removed the play between the threads.

It was clunky, but it seemed to work. However, this turned out to be a complete waste of time.
A rod coupler by itself can give backlash in the 0.003 inch range, and any adjusting of the system in the picture just added drag.

Leadnut made of rod coupler
Rod coupler as leadnut.


This plastic sign was made with a 0.03 inch bit chucked in a Dremel.
The quality of the cuts was better than expected considering the quality of the table.

However, heavier work was of low quality since everything could flex.

The second image shows two problems.
One is the wavy lines permitted by the machine's flex.
The other is a software problem that sometimes occurred with different DXF files. The extra lines were visible in some programs and not others. The joys of cobbling software.

Small carving in plastic
Sign milled in plastic.

Problems with CNC software
Problems with DXF files.


Building this machine showed that this popular design is inherently flawed for a number of reasons.
  • Unsupported rails are flexible and permit chatter.
  • The tall gantry ends allow the gantry to rock on the rails.
  • The ends of the gantry prevent wide stock from being milled.
  • The center leadscrew does not support the ends of the gantry, so the gantry racks under low cutting forces.
  • The under table leadscrew is in the way of bed supports, so the machine cannot carry heavy stock.
  • The space under the machine is lost to other uses including fourth axis components and storage.


There had to be a better way, and the metal table was a result. The lessons learned from it were then incorporated into the prototypes that were built for the plans.

The 25x25 machine in the plans weighs a fraction of this wooden clunker, yet it has better specs even though it uses lighter materials.

The 24x48 machine weighs about the same as this trial table, but is a far more durable machine that is capable of much better work. Similar materials in a different layout make all the difference.



Back to the top

.